Dedication

Dedicated to Intensive Care nurses everywhere

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Long Day's Journey - Part three

Continues...







Once into the ICU area I ran another gauntlet – the receptionist.  Over weeks, most would let me in on suspicion that I was not masquerading as someone else.  That was a comfort.  Yet, one took delight in putting me through the hoops.  I suspect he was a retiree from one of our disciplined forces.  He had a determined look that suggested any expectation of sympathy was fruitless.  This was his domain and no anxiety-riven family member was getting past him without clearance from the shift nurse, no matter how many times I confirmed my relationship to a comatose patient.  

 Every so often, the word from the unit was to stay outside until doctors did their rounds or nurses attended to Carolie’s ablutions.  I would sit for hours, witnessing all manner of things done to her, but the occasional intervention was strangely out of bounds.  There was no obvious logic to these random exclusions, especially since they knew I was her next of kin and likely prime carer. 

I particularly failed to grasp why morning rounds were sometimes an exclusion zone.  For me, these mini seminars were a moment of clarity as the ranking ICU registrar or consulting specialist oversaw a coordinated update on each patient’s situation and prognosis, in the company of shift nurses, interns, residents and registrars.  

 In a teaching hospital, morning rounds provide trainee staff opportunities to demonstrate and build on their learning.  When not excluded completely, I found the dynamics and substance of these daily seminars instructive.  Although the artificial walls of bed screens would often exclude me, I could hover at the central station and overhear proceedings.



Senior registrars or consultants would turn up intermittently with students or an intern.  Inured to any effect these exercises might have on family, various scenarios and prognostications played out between mentor and trainee as if they were in a soundproof booth.  These were exclusive exercises for self-absorbed initiates. Carolie was an abstraction, an ‘interesting case’.  I heard every word and nothing brought comfort.  

I wondered at the complete lack of concern that the patient or family might be hearing these dire prognostications and losing hope.  In fact, he was asking his student to hypothesize on the basis of ‘knowns and unknowns'.  Her actual circumstances were beside the point.   

In recent years medical communities in some countries have focused on health design, environment, and patient-centered care; in recognition that subjective and amorphous qualities, including attitude, state of mind, and personal empowerment, can have an enormous impact on a patient's treatment and recovery.  I saw some evidence of this evolving regime in the practices of ICU nurses and a few medical staff, but Australia has a long way to travel if equal emphasis is to be given to inner and outer healing. 

The relative willingness of key players to enlighten, listen and respond to real concerns and fears was instructive as an indicator of progress.   The majority of nurses and an advanced trainee specialist in intensive care provided glimpses of how an integrated model might work with doctors and nurses working together closely at its hub.   

Rather than operate on the periphery - a ‘high-wire exponent’ called on only as required - the trainee was hands-on from the outset.  His explanations of Carolie’s treatments were regular, informative, detailed and constructive, avoiding the pre-determined prognostications of others we encountered.  He dealt solely with actual specificities, rather than generalized declarations, and kept me abreast of updates generated from CT scans, angiograms, X-rays, pathology tests and any associated revisions to the treatment regime.  It was refreshing, comforting and most of all, empowering, to have quality feedback and a manifestly genuine interest in our plight.  I was more relaxed when he was on shift and missed his input terribly when he moved on.



From our overall experience, Australia has a way to travel to be at the leading edge of integrated care. Courses abound and there is an emphasis on skills development, but the labyrinth only showed glimmers of interest in holistic healing approaches.   




Rather, the medical establishment seemed inclined to pull up the drawbridge and repel boarders. 

A medical culture steeped in highly structured, rigid work practices, with truncated dialogue between in-house cohorts, patients, family, carers and other stakeholders, will be slow to change.  Yet, a better paradigm might be on the horizon. Following is the mission statement of the “life house” under construction for cancer care:



The facility will integrate clinical care, research, education and integrative therapies, creating opportunities for innovative discoveries, compassionate holistic care and better outcomes for patients, their families and carers.


This could be a healing space if the promise is more than just a glossy ‘promo’.  Positive indicators from our own journey left me with hope that certain redundant practices might evolve in time. 



Thoughts of how to manage life-threatening illness come into stark relief when patients in danger surround you.  The spatial disharmony of the ICUs – the ‘fractured mosaic’ referred to earlier - was hardly ideal.   
 
I kept imagining the characteristics of an effective healing space, where teams of allied professionals and complementary therapists worked together in an integrated way, technically and spatially, with patients at the centre.  It would curtail the endless traipsing off to other areas for various procedures, physical disruptions that must inevitably disturb, and occasionally threaten, recovery processes.  Removal from and return to the controlled environment of the ICU was a constant for Carolie throughout her stay.    




The traditional hospital design of intersecting linear corridors on multiple floors is counter-intuitive to service integration and management.  The old layered box construct, typical of 19th and 20th century administrative systems, is not conducive to an enlightened approach to hospital management, as described above. Architecture informed by an integrated philosophy of healing would see a different paradigm emerge. The labyrinth would get a makeover, spatially and culturally.



 To be continued....

No comments:

Post a Comment